Topic: Site
How do people like the new site?
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Does my vote really count?
The quick setup of the new site unfortunately illustrates Svag's incompetence, as well as the dubiousness of his claim that he was working 20 hours a week on ASFAR matters. But on a brighter note, it empowers those of us actually committed to ASFAR's success in several ways. Firstly, it deprives Svag of much of his "leverage" by denying him control over the ASFAR website. Once we re-assert control over the original domain, we'll be in the indisputably upper position. Secondly, it illustrates that the new staff is better able to manage these affairs than the previous administration was, which we can all be thankful for.
To clarify Agna's point above, I started this site at around 2:30 PM on Friday. This entire site was created from scratch in one weekend. We have the Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, the five position papers published by ASFAR, board and staff list, membership application, blog, and these forums. All of it is easily accessible and has human-readable URL. Svag's site, on the other hand, was created with the files he had access to as president (as he was when he began work on the site) two and a half months ago. He has the bylaws, an outdated board and staff list, and the articles of incorporation. There might be more hidden in the navigation, but it's hard to tell. The URL aren't human-usable either. Oh, and it barfs errors at the bottom of every page and has Joomla's logo at the top of every page. I don't have a problem with Joomla, I've done a bit of work with them even, but they have their own site!
Nice site. It's also nice we have a forum now. Looks like we're catching up to NYRA 
Hello This is Robert I use to be one of the moderators from the old forum
To be honest I miss the old forum although it had a lot of problems
( which could have been fixed) I feel we lost a lot of valuable comments and in sites
which has been lost many people put a lot of thought in some of the articles they posted I know I did I feel that old forum should be reinstated and updated to the latest version of
phpbb which now has a lot of security and features but this is just my opinion take it for what it is worth.
I'm not even sure we can retrieve the content from the old forum. The index was archived, but individual forum contents weren't, and I'm not sure if there were any preservation attempts on the part of Svag or Susan. I never posted on that forum myself.
Well the old forum was a old version of phpbb so all that would be needed is a copy of the data base I offer the web master all kinds of tips on how to clean up the old forum and clean up the data base and do some upgrades as well as improveing security on many occasions but I was just ignored so after a while I just gave up.
as far as this forum goes Iam having problems logging in I have to enabale both of cookies and place a check mark in the box before I can log in, I do not like having my cookes turned on to many security risk.
I just think it's sad to lose all that input from so many peopel that contribuited to the old forum.
Last edited by Robert (09-17-2009 22:32:14)
I just added new forums related to youth rights issues based on the old format...that forum was lost during Svag's presidency. 
Feel free to offer suggestions.
I just added new forums related to youth rights issues based on the old format...that forum was lost during Svag's presidency.
Feel free to offer suggestions.
Nothing was lost. Everything is where it was before. I simply took down the forums because there weren't enough people interested to justify the time involved in moderating and supervising them. I will put them back up on the main (youthliberation.org) site if and when enough interest returns to justify such a judgment call.
If there weren't many people involved, then what expenditures would have been involved in moderation and supervision anyway? What would there have been to moderate and supervise that would have cost time and resources? There will never be enough "interest" as you define it in whatever forum you set up because there's not enough "interest" in your delusions to begin with.
P.S. Lindsay banned you, and I removed the ban because I support free speech n' shit. 
The forums were taken down because they were overrun by SPAM, which required moderator attention to diminish and ultimately defeat. The process of deleting automatically added members was time-consuming enough to justify bringing down the forum TWICE.
There is plenty of interest in an ASFAR forum. You could have had the old one on the old site to do more and better than you're doing here if you would simply admit that the parliamentary rules are binding and that acts in violation of them are invalid and ineffectual. This would also allow you to remove me properly and without delay, and to hold an actual Board meeting to ratify all the great ideas your central committee has cooked up for ASFAR.
I thank you for removing Lindsay's ban. It would speak poorly to future staff about the way ASFAR receives its distinguished (some-would-say-soon-to-be-)past officers to let a web design associate silence the person who is principally responsible for the present existence of ASFAR (which you know I am). Keeping an organization alive from the exodus of 2006 to your arrival was not an easy task.
I now digress. What do you gain from the continuation of this dispute? We may enter the New Year with no Board, no leadership in key workplan areas and no plan for continuity of any operations other than the maintenance of a website BY EITHER SIDE. This game of running away from a nasty parliamentary fight and starting back where I started in 2006 is not good for ASFAR or anyone involved in it, and I really wish you would come back, if only to observe the formalities and give me a proper send-off that won't sabotage my ability to build myself a proper scientific and/or legal platform from which to advocate youth rights.
I'm working on a new beta site. The old site stays around until it's entirely set up, though.
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.